The Purpose and Practice of Precedent: What the Decade Long Debate Over Stare Decisis Teaches Us About the New Roberts Court

Russell A. Miller

The Purpose and Practice of Precedent: What the Decade Long Debate Over Stare Decisis Teaches Us About the New Roberts Court

Research output: Contribution to Journal › Article

Original language	American English
Journal	UC Law Constitutional Quarterly
State	Published - 2024

Disciplines

Constitutional Law
Jurisprudence
Law
Supreme Court of the United States

Access to Document

The Purpose and Practice of Precedent What the Decade Long DebatFinal published version, 874 KBLicense: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{4cdf279e346b48fca4e9b3c63c5b7a0f,

title = "The Purpose and Practice of Precedent: What the Decade Long Debate Over Stare Decisis Teaches Us About the New Roberts Court",

author = "Miller, {Russell A.}",

note = "Russell A. Miller, The Purpose and Practice of Precedent: What the Decade Long Debate Over Stare Decisis Teaches Us About the New Roberts Court, 51 UC L. Const. Q. 231 (2024).",

year = "2024",

language = "American English",

journal = "UC Law Constitutional Quarterly",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Purpose and Practice of Precedent: What the Decade Long Debate Over Stare Decisis Teaches Us About the New Roberts Court

AU - Miller, Russell A.

N1 - Russell A. Miller, The Purpose and Practice of Precedent: What the Decade Long Debate Over Stare Decisis Teaches Us About the New Roberts Court, 51 UC L. Const. Q. 231 (2024).

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

UR - https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlufac/827

M3 - Article

JO - UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

JF - UC Law Constitutional Quarterly

ER -

The Purpose and Practice of Precedent: What the Decade Long Debate Over Stare Decisis Teaches Us About the New Roberts Court

Disciplines

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this