Restating Restitution: The RestatementProcess and Its Critics

Doug Rendleman

Restating Restitution: The RestatementProcess and Its Critics

Washington and Lee University School of Law

Research output: Contribution to Journal › Article

Original language	American English
Journal	Washington and Lee Law Review
State	Published - 2008

Keywords

Legal drafting
Restitution
Slayer rule
Unmarried couples
Cohabitation
American Law Institute
Restatement (Third) of the Law of Restitution and Unjust Enrichment (Proposed)

Disciplines

Legal Remedies

Access to Document

Restating Restitution The RestatementProcess and Its CriticsFinal published version, 689 KBLicense: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{23fb67c8dcd94eb9a5507456791699f4,

title = "Restating Restitution: The RestatementProcess and Its Critics",

keywords = "Legal drafting, Restitution, Slayer rule, Unmarried couples, Cohabitation, American Law Institute, Restatement (Third) of the Law of Restitution and Unjust Enrichment (Proposed)",

author = "Doug Rendleman",

year = "2008",

language = "American English",

journal = "Washington and Lee Law Review",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Restating Restitution: The RestatementProcess and Its Critics

AU - Rendleman, Doug

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

KW - Legal drafting

KW - Restitution

KW - Slayer rule

KW - Unmarried couples

KW - Cohabitation

KW - American Law Institute

KW - Restatement (Third) of the Law of Restitution and Unjust Enrichment (Proposed)

UR - https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr/vol65/iss3/4

M3 - Article

JO - Washington and Lee Law Review

JF - Washington and Lee Law Review

ER -

Restating Restitution: The RestatementProcess and Its Critics

Keywords

Disciplines

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this