Interpretation and Interdependence: How Judges Use the Avoidance Canon in Separation of Powers Cases

Brian C Murchison

Interpretation and Interdependence: How Judges Use the Avoidance Canon in Separation of Powers Cases

Research output: Contribution to Journal › Article

Original language	American English
Journal	Georgia Law Review
State	Published - 1995

Keywords

Judges
separation of powers
first amendment

Disciplines

First Amendment
Judges
Law

Access to Document

Interpretation and Interdependence How Judges Use the AvoidanceFinal published version, 16.4 MBLicense: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{cfc8d920f7564dfeb6eba239d2f934b6,

title = "Interpretation and Interdependence: How Judges Use the Avoidance Canon in Separation of Powers Cases",

keywords = "Judges, separation of powers, first amendment",

author = "Murchison, {Brian C}",

note = "Brian C. Murchison, Interpretation and Interdependence: How Judges Use the Avoidance Canon in Separation of Powers Cases, 30 Georgia L. Rev. 85 (1995).",

year = "1995",

language = "American English",

journal = "Georgia Law Review",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interpretation and Interdependence: How Judges Use the Avoidance Canon in Separation of Powers Cases

AU - Murchison, Brian C

N1 - Brian C. Murchison, Interpretation and Interdependence: How Judges Use the Avoidance Canon in Separation of Powers Cases, 30 Georgia L. Rev. 85 (1995).

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

KW - Judges

KW - separation of powers

KW - first amendment

UR - https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlufac/315

M3 - Article

JO - Georgia Law Review

JF - Georgia Law Review

ER -

Interpretation and Interdependence: How Judges Use the Avoidance Canon in Separation of Powers Cases

Keywords

Disciplines

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this