Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparando la Norma Anti-Elusiva General de la Ley del Impuesto a la Renta con la Doctrina de Abuso de Derecho del Civil Law (Parte II)

Translated title of the contribution: Comparing the General Anti-Avoidance Rule of Income Tax Law with the Civil Law Doctrine of Abuse of Law (Part II)

Research output: Contribution to Journal › Translation

Abstract

Translation into Spanish of Zoë Prebble & John Prebble, Comparing the General Anti-Avoidance Rule of Income Tax Law with the Civil Law Doctrine of Abuse of Law (Part II), Bull. for Int'l Tax'n, Apr. 2008, at 151.

El presente artículo compara y analiza la manera en que los Estados miembros de la Unión Europea, los Estados Unidos y el Reino Unido combaten la elusión tributaria a través de sus sistemas legales. El artículo aborda temas como la influencia del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea y el caso Cadbury Schweppes en el establecimiento de normas antielusivas en los Estados miembros de la Unión Europea, y la aplicación de la doctrina de la simulación en los Estados Unidos y en el Reino Unido.

This article compares and analyzes how member States of the European Union, the United States of America and the United Kingdom combat tax avoidance through its legal systems. The article addresses issues such as the influence of the Court of Justice of the European Union and the case Cadbury Schweppes in establishing anti-avoidance rules in member States of the European Union and the application of Business Purpose Doctrine in the United States of America and the United Kingdom.
Translated title of the contributionComparing the General Anti-Avoidance Rule of Income Tax Law with the Civil Law Doctrine of Abuse of Law (Part II)
Original languageSpanish
JournalIus et Veritas
StatePublished - 2015

Cite this