Arbitration and the Supreme Court: A Critique from Plaintiff's Counsel in Green Tree v. Randolph

Suzette Malveaux

Arbitration and the Supreme Court: A Critique from Plaintiff's Counsel in Green Tree v. Randolph

Suzette Malveaux

Research output: Contribution to Journal › Article

Original language	American English
Journal	The Advocate
Issue number	Winter 2003
State	Published - 2003

Disciplines

Law
Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
Litigation
Supreme Court of the United States

Access to Document

25Advocate20.pdfFinal published version, 1.36 MBLicense: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{3ae7e7ebe01b4e27a7f2da819082465e,

title = "Arbitration and the Supreme Court: A Critique from Plaintiff's Counsel in Green Tree v. Randolph",

author = "Suzette Malveaux",

note = "Suzette M. Malveaux, Arbitration and the Supreme Court: A Critique from Plaintiff's Counsel in Green Tree v. Randolph, Advocate (Texas), Winter 2003, at 20.",

year = "2003",

language = "American English",

journal = "The Advocate",

number = "Winter 2003",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Arbitration and the Supreme Court: A Critique from Plaintiff's Counsel in Green Tree v. Randolph

AU - Malveaux, Suzette

N1 - Suzette M. Malveaux, Arbitration and the Supreme Court: A Critique from Plaintiff's Counsel in Green Tree v. Randolph, Advocate (Texas), Winter 2003, at 20.

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

M3 - Article

JO - The Advocate

JF - The Advocate

IS - Winter 2003

ER -